On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 07:41:30PM +1000, skaller wrote:

> Ah, ok .. that isn't what the documentation seems to imply
> by saying 'not implemented'. If you are correct,
> it *is* implemented, just having quite different
> semantics.

Since windows doesn't have symlinks the semantics of stat and lstat
would be the same.

Also, don't you need to ignore '.' and '..' on windows as well?  They
are at least present in the FAT filesystem, although the directory
reading operations may not return them.

Dave Brown

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners