On Thursday 20 May 2004 21:30, Eric Stokes wrote:
> ...
> No, that is the case with dynamic linking, not static linking. The only
> issue with
> static linking and commercial stuff is that your patches are likely to
> be much bigger.
> However the good thing about it is that your code is fairly immune to
> dynamic library
> changes on the client machine.

Would my users not keep getting unavoidable "The files blah.cmi and mylib.cmi 
make inconsistent assumptions over interface Blah"?

Cheers,
Jon.

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners