[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Alain.Frisch@e... |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Functors |
On Thu, 6 May 2004, Jon Harrop wrote: > As someone else said, using a "defunctorizer" apparently makes it impossible > to perform some static analysis. I don't know who said that, but Julien Signoles said the opposite: > Morever, static analysis tools do not generally correctly work on > functorized programs: so a source-to-source defunctorizer as ocamldefun > can be used by these tools while a defunctorizer directly included in > the compiler cannot. To rephrase it: since some static analysis are difficult to perform on fonctors, it is good to have a standalone defunctorizer (not burried into the compiler) to be used as a first pass of the analysis. -- Alain ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners