Browse thread
[Caml-list] Total application of function with labels
- Manos Renieris
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Manos Renieris <er@c...> |
| Subject: | [Caml-list] Total application of function with labels |
Total applications of functions with labeled arguments will work,
even if the actual arguments have no labels. So if you call
let my_a = ... in
let my_b = ... in
f my_b my_a
it doesn't matter whether you declared
let f (a:int) (b:int) = a * (b + 1);;
or
let f ~(a:int) ~(b:int) = a * (b + 1);;
and none will save you from the bug of passing the arguments in the
wrong order. A bug like this cost me a few nights of sleep a while ago.
Is there a programming convention that would "enforce" labeling the
arguments in a total application of a certain function?
Thanks,
-- Manos
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners