skaller wrote:
> Xavier Leroy wrote:
>
> > A good component model for OCaml (and other languages):
> > that would be
> > interesting.  Shared libraries for the sake of shared
> > libraries: that
> > isn't interesting in the least.
>
> In Python, you can simply install PyOracle and go.
> Do you really think there is any comparison between
> that and recompiling Python????

I don't see any relevance to what Xavier wrote.  Do you have a
suggestion for an OCaml component model?  "Python is cool!" isn't an
operative suggestion.  It has a rather different type model and there's
a price to pay for its flexibility.


Cheers,                     www.indiegamedesign.com
Brandon Van Every           Seattle, WA

"The pioneer is the one with the arrows in his back."
                          - anonymous entrepreneur

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.686 / Virus Database: 447 - Release Date: 5/14/2004

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners