[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2004-05-06 (21:14) |
From: | Olivier Grisel <olivier.grisel@e...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Functors |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Alain.Frisch@ens.fr a écrit : | On Thu, 6 May 2004, Jon Harrop wrote: |>Morever, static analysis tools do not generally correctly work on |>functorized programs: so a source-to-source defunctorizer as ocamldefun |>can be used by these tools while a defunctorizer directly included in |>the compiler cannot. | | | To rephrase it: since some static analysis are difficult to perform on | fonctors, it is good to have a standalone defunctorizer (not burried | into the compiler) to be used as a first pass of the analysis. | Yes, but what about embedding ocamldefun as option/switch in the compiler's command. Users could see it as another optimization option easy enough to trigger by just adding or removing a flag in the makefile. Those who wants to perform static analysis could use some other switch to explicitely dump the defunctorised source code, eg : $ ocamlopt -dump-defun foo.ml > defun_foo.ml best - -- Olivier -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAmoNcTsBRE+WZ2SARAhTDAJ9liZz3MSVD0h0opFPTGSR8JJnyUQCgts+m saP/ghOn3b5RRpFYIstOP+g= =rIIi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners