[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2004-05-02 (16:57) |
From: | james woodyatt <jhw@w...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Set |
On 02 May 2004, at 01:51, Jon Harrop wrote: > > When the docs for Set say that it presents elements in an > "unspecified" order > to "fold" does it, in fact, always present them in increasing order? A note: modules produced by the [Cf_rbtree.Set(E)] functor in my recently released Cf library deliberately presents elements in an indeterminate order, so as to minimize the amount of tree rotations required for set operations constructed from [fold] and [filter]. If you want the elements in increasing or decreasing order, the functions you want are [to_seq_incr] and [to_seq_decr] (or possibly [to_list_incr] and [to_list_decr] if you know you're going to want all of them). -- j h woodyatt <jhw@wetware.com> that's my village calling... no doubt, they want their idiot back. ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners