[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Alex Baretta <alex@b...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] unix.chop_extension |
Xavier Leroy wrote:
> Concerning the Str interface, I received several complaints about it,
> to which I replied "why don't you propose an alternate functional API?",
> to which I never got any reply. So, if you have ideas, go ahead. If
> you can get some peer reviewing on your design, that would be much better.
> Good APIs aren't easy to design (witness the lengthy discussion on I/O
> on this list), so it's unlikely that you can find a good one all by
> yourself in 30 minutes.
Actually, I'm a happy user of Str, but I find the absence in Ocaml of a
functional "canonical" regexp feature striking.
>>There's one extra thing I'd like to point out. We have the
>>chop_extension function. Why in the world is there no find_extension
>>function?
>>find_extension "foo.bar" --> "bar"
>
>
> Why in the world would that be generally useful? Remember, we don't
> shoot for completeness (it's unattainable anyway), just for
> usefulness.
find_extension would be no more and no less general than chop_extension.
It's actually the dual of the latter, in a way. Again, it's no big deal,
but it seems to me that the lack of a find_extension function in
Filename is an involuntary omission rather than a well thought out
design decision.
***
Are the following two pieces of code not dual of each other? Is this not
a good enough reason to include the former?
let file_extension name =
try
let index = String.rindex name '.' + 1 in
let ext_len = String.length name - index in
String.sub name index ext_len
with Not_found ->
invalid_arg "Xcaml.file_extension"
let chop_extension name =
try
String.sub name 0 (String.rindex name '.')
with Not_found ->
invalid_arg "Filename.chop_extension"
Duality is a property I consider of paramount importance in a formal
model. Ocaml is a modeling language for algorithms. Duality is central
to Ocaml, in my opinion. For this very same reason I once asked why such
a crucial operator as ++ had not been included in Pervasives.
Alex
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners