Browse thread
[Caml-list] interesting array efficiency observations
-
briand@a...
-
Yamagata Yoriyuki
- Olivier Grisel
- Christophe TROESTLER
- Xavier Leroy
- malc
-
Yamagata Yoriyuki
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2004-05-09 (00:25) |
From: | Christophe TROESTLER <Christophe.Troestler@u...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] interesting array efficiency observations |
On Sun, 09 May 2004, Yamagata Yoriyuki <yoriyuki@mbg.ocn.ne.jp> wrote: > > From: briand@aracnet.com > > > I was investigating the use of 1-D bigarray's vs Array and noticed > > that the 1-D bigarray using c_layout seems to be slower than Array. > > Yes, it is expected, since a.{j} expands a call of a C function, while > a.(j) expands inlined assembly codes. Is it? Ocamlopt does inline the call when the bigarray type is fully known, doesn't it. ChriS ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners