Browse thread
[Caml-list] Great Programming Language Shootout Revived
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2004-06-18 (15:39) |
From: | Brian Hurt <bhurt@s...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Great Programming Language Shootout Revived |
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Sebastien Ferre wrote: > What about counting characters instead (counting several spaces in > a row as only one character) ? As most languages just don't mind > where you cut the lines, this seems to me a more fair measure. > Also, this would give complete freedom on the indentation style > without resulting in any disadvantage for the language rank. > > Just a suggestion :) > Actually, the idea I like is to pick a standard compression algorithm- say gzip, or bzip2- and compress the files. This actually gives you a decent approximation of the amount of information the soure code contains- and entire sidesteps a lot of issues. In addition to newlines and indenting, it also minimizes the effect of variable name length. For example, the average name length for ocaml programs is probably a lot shorter than the average name length for java programs. -- "Usenet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea -- massive, difficult to redirect, awe-inspiring, entertaining, and a source of mind-boggling amounts of excrement when you least expect it." - Gene Spafford Brian ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners