Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] the maddening filter
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Brandon J. Van Every <vanevery@i...>
Subject: RE: [Caml-list] the maddening filter
Being surprised that this made it through, I'll attempt the next quanta:
- Seattle ML SIG meeting during week of July 5th, location and time TBD
- e-mail me if interested

> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> []On Behalf Of Brandon J. Van
> Every
> Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 10:50 AM
> To: caml
> Subject: [Caml-list] the maddening filter
> Try as I might, I cannot get a message about the Seattle ML SIG to go
> through.  I am avoiding the use of certain words on the
> presumption that
> I am filtered because of them.  I have two questions:
> 1) is there any practical way to test the filter's algorithm?
> 2) can't we have something else, like a "known ok posters" list?
> I notice that in the time I've been trying to get a legitimate
> announcement through, we've gotten some nudie enhancement product
> thingy.  I do not like the algorithm's priorities.  I feel like I'm
> spelling out letters to avoid a smart animal hearing them.
> Cheers,           
> Brandon Van Every           Seattle, WA
> "The pioneer is the one with the arrows in his back."
>                           - anonymous entrepreneur
> -------------------
> To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list:

To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: