Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] Why must types be always defined at the top level?
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2004-06-25 (12:30)
From: skaller <skaller@u...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Why must types be always defined at the top level?
On Fri, 2004-06-25 at 21:07, Basile Starynkevitch [local] wrote:

> (there is no slot in custom data to support Ocaml values inside them
> neither)

Then how does Marshal work on them?

> Probably encapsulating such values (or just your bignums) inside
> object should work, since objects have immutable identities and
> hashcodes.

Ah. That's a thought. Thanks! I'll try that.

John Skaller,
voice: 061-2-9660-0850, 
snail: PO BOX 401 Glebe NSW 2037 Australia
Checkout the Felix programming language

To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: