Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
[Caml-list] Why must types be always defined at the top level?
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: skaller <skaller@u...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Why must types be always defined at the top level?
On Fri, 2004-06-25 at 21:07, Basile Starynkevitch [local] wrote:

> (there is no slot in custom data to support Ocaml values inside them
> neither)

Then how does Marshal work on them?

> Probably encapsulating such values (or just your bignums) inside
> object should work, since objects have immutable identities and
> hashcodes.

Ah. That's a thought. Thanks! I'll try that.

-- 
John Skaller, mailto:skaller@users.sf.net
voice: 061-2-9660-0850, 
snail: PO BOX 401 Glebe NSW 2037 Australia
Checkout the Felix programming language http://felix.sf.net



-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners