Browse thread
[Caml-list] Why must types be always defined at the top level?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | 2004-06-25 (12:30) |
| From: | skaller <skaller@u...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Why must types be always defined at the top level? |
On Fri, 2004-06-25 at 21:07, Basile Starynkevitch [local] wrote: > (there is no slot in custom data to support Ocaml values inside them > neither) Then how does Marshal work on them? > Probably encapsulating such values (or just your bignums) inside > object should work, since objects have immutable identities and > hashcodes. Ah. That's a thought. Thanks! I'll try that. -- John Skaller, mailto:skaller@users.sf.net voice: 061-2-9660-0850, snail: PO BOX 401 Glebe NSW 2037 Australia Checkout the Felix programming language http://felix.sf.net ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners