Browse thread
[Caml-list] OCaml compared as a scripting language
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2004-06-15 (17:43) |
From: | William D. Neumann <wneumann@c...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] OCaml compared as a scripting language |
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, Richard Jones wrote: > OCaml < Perl <<<<<<< Java > > In fact I don't think I've ever seen anything as horribly verbose (and > useless) as Java. COBOL perhaps? Mmmmm... now you're bringing back the memories. Yeah, I think COBOL pretty much has to rank as one of the least dense programming languages out there (not counting fringe stuff like unlambda) -- especially if you go all "hardcore" and type things like MULTIPLY A BY B GIVING C. instead of C = A * B. Heh. COBOL was fun. William D. Neumann --- "Well I could be a genius, if I just put my mind to it. And I...I could do anything, if only I could get 'round to it. Oh we were brought up on the space-race, now they expect you to clean toilets. When you've seen how big the world is, how can you make do with this? If you want me, I'll be sleeping in - sleeping in throughout these glory days." -- Jarvis Cocker Think of XML as Lisp for COBOL programmers. -- Tony-A (some guy on /.) ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners