Browse thread
[Caml-list] Why must types be always defined at the top level?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2004-06-25 (14:37) |
From: | Christophe Raffalli <Christophe.Raffalli@u...> |
Subject: | [Caml-list] Thread and kernel 2.6 pb still there in CVS |
I tried to submit a change in vouillon's entry in the bug tracking system (classed as not a bug because can not reproduce), but as I am not sure it worked, So I also post this here In the latest CVS of ocaml there is still the periodic call Thread.yield (through a sigalarm) in thread_posix.ml This implies that a threaded OCaml program ON A LINUX KERNEL 2.6 (at least 2.6.3 on Mandrake 10, but probaby all 2.6) gets very little CPU when another process is running (the usual figure is 10% CPU for the threaded OCaml program against 90% for another program) Could you do something before the next release, because GlSurf is really not working on my linux boxes without this change. -- By the way, why does OCaml needs that periodic call Thread.yield ? -- Christophe Raffalli Université de Savoie Batiment Le Chablais, bureau 21 73376 Le Bourget-du-Lac Cedex tél: (33) 4 79 75 81 03 fax: (33) 4 79 75 87 42 mail: Christophe.Raffalli@univ-savoie.fr www: http://www.lama.univ-savoie.fr/~RAFFALLI --------------------------------------------- IMPORTANT: this mail is signed using PGP/MIME At least Enigmail/Mozilla, mutt or evolution can check this signature ---------------------------------------------