English version
Accueil     À propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    

Ce site est rarement mis à jour. Pour les informations les plus récentes, rendez-vous sur le nouveau site OCaml à l'adresse ocaml.org.

Browse thread
[Caml-list] Why must types be always defined at the top level?
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2004-06-25 (16:08)
From: Marco Maggesi <maggesi@m...>
Subject: [Caml-list] Re: Thread and kernel 2.6 pb still there in CVS
On 2004-06-25, Christophe Raffalli <Christophe.Raffalli@univ-savoie.fr> wrote:
> This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
> --------------enigAA0A01B71AF5B0A0E7B1B37F
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> I tried to submit a change in vouillon's entry in the bug tracking 
> system (classed as not a bug because can not reproduce), but as I am not 
> sure it worked, So I also post this here
> In the latest CVS of ocaml there is still the periodic call Thread.yield 
> (through a sigalarm) in thread_posix.ml
> This implies that a threaded OCaml program ON A LINUX KERNEL 2.6 (at 
> least 2.6.3 on Mandrake 10, but probaby all 2.6) gets very little CPU 
> when another process is running (the usual figure is 10% CPU for the 
> threaded OCaml program against 90% for another program)
> Could you do something before the next release, because GlSurf is really 
> not working on my linux boxes without this change.
> --
> By the way, why does OCaml needs that  periodic call Thread.yield ?

Ah, so this should be also the answer to this bug in Coq


  -- M

To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners