Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] Default values for structures (feature request)
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Christopher Dutchyn <cdutchyn@c...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Default values for structures (feature request)

On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Richard Jones wrote:

> Out of interest, is there a theoretical reason why types shouldn't
> contain values, or is it just because it's a lot of work to change the
> compiler?

This leads to dependent types, and pure type systems, and other esoterica
that are still active research areas -- (read: there are important
questions lacking goood answers).

Chris Dutchyn

To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: