Browse thread
[Caml-list] OCaml compared as a scripting language
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Karl Zilles <zilles@1...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] OCaml compared as a scripting language |
John Goerzen wrote: > My experience has been that OCaml is a lot more verbose than Perl. For > instance, to output an integer to a file, I'd have to do: > > fprintf fd "%d\n" theint; vs. > print FD "$theint\n"; Wow! That's 4 extra characters! I've ported several thousand-line perl scripts to OCaml. My experience is that the resulting scripts are about the same size as the original scripts. They're just infinitely easier to maintain. There is a lot of syntactic sugar in perl (especially for i/o) that makes simple programs very small. As the program grows more complex, the benefits are fewer. ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners