Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] More or bignums/ints
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2004-06-15 (20:20)
From: Brian Hurt <bhurt@s...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] More or bignums/ints
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, John Hughes wrote:

> I've read the May interchange in CWN that started with the question
> > I have made a web search to understand which kind of support for 
> > bignums is available for OCaml...
> and found it interesting. I'll be teaching a few weeks of ML as part 
> of a first-year course at Brown University, and we've used SML in 
> previous years. 

By the way, how well does this work?  Just out of curiosity.

I've never taught beginning anything to anyone, so I know diddly squat 
about about what works and what doesn't work.  That said, I think I'd 
rather teach Ocaml as a first language than either C++ or Java, but I 
think Scheme might be an even better language than Ocaml as a first 

"Usenet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea -- massive,
difficult to redirect, awe-inspiring, entertaining, and a source of
mind-boggling amounts of excrement when you least expect it."
                                - Gene Spafford 

To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: