Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] Great Programming Language Shootout Revived
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk <qrczak@k...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Great Programming Language Shootout Revived
W li¶cie z sob, 19-06-2004, godz. 13:56 +0200, Nicolas Janin napisa³(a):

> Concerning the idea of zipping the source codes as a measure of code length,
> I find it quite good, as the zipped code is less sensitive to code layout
> than a pure line count and is a decent measure of the information conveyed.

I don't like this as a measure of the amount of code which must be
written and maintained, because copy&paste might actually come shorter
or equal to introducing appropriate named abstractions, while being much
worse design.

I think token count is the most objective measure from measures which
are reasonably easy to take automatically. If not token count, then
line count, and finally character count.

   __("<         Marcin Kowalczyk

To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: