On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 12:48:01AM +0200, Pierre Weis wrote:
> In conclusion: pure Camlp4 implementation of ocamllex/ocamlyacc is
> still an interesting and challenging progamming task for the next few
> years, if you (or someone else) had the will and time to provide two
> ``great camlp4 examples'' to the rest of us...

Is such a thing even possible?  I thought ocamllex/ocamlyacc produced
parsers for LALR(1) languages while camlp4 produced parsers for LL(k)
languages.  These two sets do not bear a subset relation in either
direction, so i would think it impossible to completely implement either
tool in terms of the other.  Have i misunderstood something?

cheers,
William

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners