Browse thread
[Caml-list] Suggestion: a possible alternative to shared libraries?
-
Benjamin Geer
-
Gerd Stolpmann
- Benjamin Geer
-
Gerd Stolpmann
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2004-06-14 (15:37) |
From: | Benjamin Geer <benjamin.geer@m...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Suggestion: a possible alternative to shared libraries? |
Gerd Stolpmann wrote: > Much easier: Include the MD5 signature in the name of the shared > library. And use the operating system's run-time linker? That would make for very long library names... but maybe that wouldn't be too terrible. > However, the hell persists: You don't know which versions are still in > use. Do you mean in memory, or by installed programs that aren't necessarily running? To take care of the first problem, wouldn't it be possible to maintain a count of the processes that currently have a library mapped into memory? Could GODI take care of the second problem? Benjamin ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners