Browse thread
[Caml-list] Efficient C++ interfacing?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Brandon J. Van Every <vanevery@i...> |
| Subject: | RE: [Caml-list] Efficient C++ interfacing? |
I hope this makes it through. I'm having inordinate difficulty getting
anything posted lately.
Eray Ozkural wrote:
>
> What if we would like to generate bindings for a huge moving
> target like Qt or KDE libraries?
I was just tossed this link:
"C Mania: KDE 3 Offers C Bindings"
http://dot.kde.org/1003877941/
Somehow, C++ was automatically wrapped with C and mostly worked.
Creating a C layer seems to be half the problem, so I've been asking on
comp.lang.c++.moderated about automated C wrappers.
Cheers, www.indiegamedesign.com
Brandon Van Every Seattle, WA
"The pioneer is the one with the arrows in his back."
- anonymous entrepreneur
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.693 / Virus Database: 454 - Release Date: 5/31/2004
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners