Browse thread
[Caml-list] OCaml compared as a scripting language
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2004-06-15 (21:16) |
From: | Alex Baretta <alex@b...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] OCaml compared as a scripting language |
John Goerzen wrote: > On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 11:16:44AM -0700, Karl Zilles wrote: > >>Wow! That's 4 extra characters! > > > It was one example. Look at the grep example at > http://merd.sourceforge.net/pixel/language-study/scripting-language/#grep > for a much more significant difference. I'm not going to recode grep in Ocaml for any amount of money, but I can assure you that the implementation you mention is suboptimal length-wise. Besides, most other implementations are simply unreadable. A couple more lines of code are worth the extra readability in this case. Alex ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners