Browse thread
[Caml-list] kprintf with user formatters
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Damien <Damien.Pous@e...> |
| Subject: | [Caml-list] kprintf with user formatters |
Hi,
I am writing a multi-threaded program, so that I need some
synchronization when pretty-printing things :
<<
#directory "+threads";;
#load "unix.cma";;
#load "threads.cma";;
module Debug = struct
let m = Mutex.create()
let printf x =
Format.kprintf
(fun s -> Mutex.lock m; print_endline s; Mutex.unlock m)
x
end;;
(*
module Debug : sig
val m: Mutex.t
val printf : ('a, unit, string, unit) format4 -> 'a
end
*)
>>
but now, I can't _nicely_ use my previously defined printers :
suppose I have got a type with its toplevel pretty-printer :
<<
type t
val format_t: Format.formatter -> t -> unit
val x: t
>>
I would like to write :
<<
Debug.printf "val t = %a" format_t x
>>
but I cannot since the user printer is expected to be "unit->t->string"
(while it is "formatter->t->unit" for the standard Format.printf "%a")
currently I use :
<<
let (!!) f = (fun () x ->
f Format.str_formatter x;
Format.flush_str_formatter());;
(* val (!!): (Format.formatter -> 'a -> 'b) -> unit -> 'a -> string *)
Debug.printf "val t = %a" !!format_t x
>>
this seems to be working, but I wonder if :
- there is a better solution
- this use of the global value "Format.str_formatter" is really
thread-safe (I would say no...)
- I missed something
- printf could not understand a conversion character 'A' that would
always need a _general_ user-formatter (of type formatter->t->unit)
thanks,
damien
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners