Browse thread
[Caml-list] OCaml compared as a scripting language
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | John Goerzen <jgoerzen@c...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] OCaml compared as a scripting language |
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 11:16:44AM -0700, Karl Zilles wrote: > Wow! That's 4 extra characters! It was one example. Look at the grep example at http://merd.sourceforge.net/pixel/language-study/scripting-language/#grep for a much more significant difference. > There is a lot of syntactic sugar in perl (especially for i/o) that > makes simple programs very small. As the program grows more complex, > the benefits are fewer. ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners