On Monday 07 June 2004 10:41, you wrote:
> Eray Ozkural wrote:
> > g++ was still using the old bison thing; they were talking about writing
> > a parser from scratch.  I haven't followed the developments lately,
> > though.
>
> The C++ parser in g++ was rewritten as a handcrafted, top-down parser; I
> think work on it was completed last year or the year before.

If you would compare the top-down parser in g++ and ANTLR C++ grammar (2003 
release on www.antlr.org), which would be easier to work with for writing a 
translator that needs type analysis? g++ is still written in C, so I guess 
it'd be harder to extract anything useful.

Best Regards,

-- 
Eray Ozkural (exa) <erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr>
Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara  KDE Project: http://www.kde.org
http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo  Malfunction: http://malfunct.iuma.com
GPG public key fingerprint: 360C 852F 88B0 A745 F31B  EA0F 7C07 AE16 874D 539C

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners