Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
[Caml-list] Why must types be always defined at the top level?
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Benjamin Geer <ben@s...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Thread and kernel 2.6 pb still there in CVS
Xavier Leroy wrote:
> The question I'm currently investigating is whether the call to
> sched_yield() can be omitted

Ingo Molnar has suggested calling nanosleep() or sem_timedwait(sem, 
abs_timeout) instead:

http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0312.2/1127.html

Ben

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners