Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] Why must types be always defined at the top level?
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Benjamin Geer <ben@s...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Thread and kernel 2.6 pb still there in CVS
Xavier Leroy wrote:
> The question I'm currently investigating is whether the call to
> sched_yield() can be omitted

Ingo Molnar has suggested calling nanosleep() or sem_timedwait(sem, 
abs_timeout) instead:


To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: