Browse thread
[Caml-list] Why must types be always defined at the top level?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | 2004-06-28 (18:50) |
| From: | Benjamin Geer <ben@s...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Thread and kernel 2.6 pb still there in CVS |
Xavier Leroy wrote: > The question I'm currently investigating is whether the call to > sched_yield() can be omitted Ingo Molnar has suggested calling nanosleep() or sem_timedwait(sem, abs_timeout) instead: http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0312.2/1127.html Ben ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners