On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 08:41:11AM +0100, Benjamin Geer wrote:
> Eray Ozkural wrote:
> >g++ was still using the old bison thing; they were talking about writing a 
> >parser from scratch.  I haven't followed the developments lately, though.
> 
> The C++ parser in g++ was rewritten as a handcrafted, top-down parser; I 
> think work on it was completed last year or the year before.

In addition to other suggestions, I would add the possibility to use
GCC XML. See http://www.gccxml.org/ for more.

I don't know much about gcc XML, and I never used it. I just heard
about it, it is apparently a patch to GCC to dump some form of syntax
tree into some form of XML.


-- 
Basile STARYNKEVITCH -- basile dot starynkevitch at inria dot fr
Project cristal.inria.fr - Inria Rocquencourt (temporarily)
http://cristal.inria.fr/~starynke --- all opinions are only mine 

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners