Yes, you're right. Then, I don't know. It might be possible, if
pa_r.ml and pa_rp.ml have the right structure (to be processed in the
same way, producing a pa_r_fast.ml).

-- Michel

Hendrik Tews wrote/écrivait (Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 09:22:59AM +0200):
> Michel Mauny <Michel.Mauny@inria.fr> writes:
> 
>    Hendrik Tews wrote/écrivait (Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 01:17:27AM +0200):
>    
>    >    Why is it not used for the revised syntax?
>    
>    I suspect the revised syntax is meant to stay extensible, and this
>    extensibility would be lost if the parser was compiled `as much as'
>    the one obtained in pa_o_fast. 
> 
> No, this cannot be the reason. You can never extend the natively
> compiled version because you cannot load any modules.
>    
> Thanks for your answers,
> 
> Hendrik
> 
> -------------------
> To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners