Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
[Caml-list] Why must types be always defined at the top level?
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Alex Baretta <alex@b...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Thread and kernel 2.6 pb still there in CVS
Xavier Leroy wrote:

> If the above sounds mildly irritated, that's because I am.
> 
> - Xavier Leroy


Xavier is not the only irritated with the o(1) scheduler: see the 
following link from HP.

http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/linux/kernel/o1-openmp.php

Alex

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners