Browse thread
[Caml-list] Why must types be always defined at the top level?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | 2004-07-06 (09:32) |
| From: | Alex Baretta <alex@b...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Thread and kernel 2.6 pb still there in CVS |
Xavier Leroy wrote: > If the above sounds mildly irritated, that's because I am. > > - Xavier Leroy Xavier is not the only irritated with the o(1) scheduler: see the following link from HP. http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/linux/kernel/o1-openmp.php Alex ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners