Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] Why must types be always defined at the top level?
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2004-07-08 (15:03)
From: Xavier Leroy <Xavier.Leroy@i...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Thread and kernel 2.6 pb still there in CVS
> I did again some testing, with a Caml program with 2 thread, one doing 
> only float computation for a long time with no allocation. The nanosleep 
> suggestion seems much better than the actual version doing nothing:

I tried the nanosleep() trick on a different workload (several
compute-bound threads).  Scheduling was less fair than with the "do
nothing" implementation.

- Xavier Leroy

To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: