Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
[Caml-list] Why must types be always defined at the top level?
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Xavier Leroy <Xavier.Leroy@i...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Thread and kernel 2.6 pb still there in CVS
> I did again some testing, with a Caml program with 2 thread, one doing 
> only float computation for a long time with no allocation. The nanosleep 
> suggestion seems much better than the actual version doing nothing:

I tried the nanosleep() trick on a different workload (several
compute-bound threads).  Scheduling was less fair than with the "do
nothing" implementation.

- Xavier Leroy

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners