On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 19:13, Pierre Weis wrote:

> What I propose is a smoother interaction with the rest of the language
> with the (re)-introduction of lazy constructors, lazy labels and a new
> typing (and compilation) rule to facilitate the use of lazy functions.

OK: I said this looked dangerous, but the resulting discussion
convinces me that it could be worth it, since the guarrantees
I thought might be broken didn't really exist in the first place.

-- 
John Skaller, mailto:skaller@users.sf.net
voice: 061-2-9660-0850, 
snail: PO BOX 401 Glebe NSW 2037 Australia
Checkout the Felix programming language http://felix.sf.net



-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners