On 29 Jul 2004, at 09:12, Brian Hurt wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jul 2004, brogoff wrote:
>>
>> Some problems are just way easier to solve with imperative programming
>> though. Have you ever taken a look at purely functional catenable 
>> deques?
>
> Just got added to extlib, for the record.  A simplistic version that
> actually isn't that much more complicated than the imperitive
> implementation.

This is extraordinary!  Do you really mean to say the deques are purely 
functional, catenable *and* offering the same complexity as the 
non-persistent implementation?  Which algorithm was added to extlib?


$B!=(B $B!h(B

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners