English version
Accueil     À propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    

Ce site est rarement mis à jour. Pour les informations les plus récentes, rendez-vous sur le nouveau site OCaml à l'adresse ocaml.org.

Browse thread
[Caml-list] Why must types be always defined at the top level?
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2004-07-05 (15:14)
From: Christophe Raffalli <Christophe.Raffalli@u...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Thread and kernel 2.6 pb still there in CVS

The latest 3.08 CVS solves the problem (for GlSurf at least).
When I have the too Glsurf thread (on computing, one for drawing GL (I 
keep pressing a key to rotate the surface) and I launched povray from 
Glsurf for a rendering, then I get one third of cpu each which is perfect)

Just a last question:

Now I saw that for "non broken" sched_yield, the call is still present.

Are you sure that releasing the mutex is not enough to tell the 
scheduler it may be a good time to give some cpu to another caml thread 
blocked on the same mutex ?

But I am sure you tested that too and this is why the call is still 
there when possible ;-)

Christophe Raffalli
Université de Savoie
Batiment Le Chablais, bureau 21
73376 Le Bourget-du-Lac Cedex

tél: (33) 4 79 75 81 03
fax: (33) 4 79 75 87 42
mail: Christophe.Raffalli@univ-savoie.fr
www: http://www.lama.univ-savoie.fr/~RAFFALLI
IMPORTANT: this mail is signed using PGP/MIME
At least Enigmail/Mozilla, mutt or evolution
can check this signature