Alex Baretta wrote:
>
> >>We are working on a logical control framework based on
> >>Ocaml. We will
> >>release under the GPL when the API will have stabilized.
> >
> > How does a GPL license help anyone else in commercial
> > industry?  Or are
> > you going to do one of those "GPL or you can pay us" licenses?
>
> We currently develop the complete automation solution: PLC kernel,
> low-level hardware drivers, application logic. We are more
> than willing
> to share our technology with the Ocaml community in order to
> further the
> development of the core and enhance our ability to develop custom
> application logic at lightning speed.

Great... again, how is a GPL license workable for others with a
commercial interest in the technology?  I am saying that license is not
workable.

> The conclusion: Ocaml is a mature industrial language. It's
> definitely not plain theory.

I think I'd say "proven in this instance" rather than "mature."
Maturity has connotations of widespread usage and ready availablility of
software and programmers.  In OCaml-land, that's certainly work
remaining to be done.  I'm encouraged that I've been able to start a ML
SIG in Seattle, and one guy actually gets paid to use OCaml at his job,
but most don't.


Cheers,                     www.indiegamedesign.com
Brandon Van Every           Seattle, WA

When no one else sells courage, supply and demand take hold.

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners