Browse thread
[Caml-list] Why must types be always defined at the top level?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Christophe Raffalli <christophe.raffalli@u...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Thread and kernel 2.6 pb still there in CVS |
I did again some testing, with a Caml program with 2 thread, one doing
only float computation for a long time with no allocation. The nanosleep
suggestion seems much better than the actual version doing nothing:
This gives the following code in systhreads/posix.c:
/* Allow re-scheduling */
value caml_thread_yield(value unit) /* ML */
{
struct timespec timer = { 0, 1 };
enter_blocking_section();
nanosleep (&timer, NULL);
/* sched_yield();*/
leave_blocking_section();
return Val_unit;
}
--
Christophe Raffalli
Université de Savoie
Batiment Le Chablais, bureau 21
73376 Le Bourget-du-Lac Cedex
tél: (33) 4 79 75 81 03
fax: (33) 4 79 75 87 42
mail: Christophe.Raffalli@univ-savoie.fr
www: http://www.lama.univ-savoie.fr/~RAFFALLI
---------------------------------------------
IMPORTANT: this mail is signed using PGP/MIME
At least Enigmail/Mozilla, mutt or evolution
can check this signature
---------------------------------------------
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners