Browse thread
[Caml-list] What's the current status of int32 and int64 boxing?
- John Prevost
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | John Prevost <j.prevost@g...> |
| Subject: | [Caml-list] What's the current status of int32 and int64 boxing? |
I was just wondering what exactly to expect for performance with int32 and int64 types in records and arrays right now. Browsing through the archives, I got the feeling that these types currently appear unboxed in record types, but boxed in array types. Is that still correct? John. ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners