On Fri, 30 Jul 2004, james woodyatt wrote:
> On 30 Jul 2004, at 10:07, brogoff wrote:
> >
> > I would like to see an implementation of the catenable deques only
> > using simple list ops (not laziness) described by Kaplan and Tarjan,
> > in OCaml.
>
> Sure.  Here is the basic implementation I did for performance
> comparisons.

Thanks. I emailed you back a version with the magic gone, using the recursive
module extension to bulldozer over your abuse of the type system ;-). It's the
least offensive (IMO of course) of the current workarounds. I wonder if the
implementors can tell us if there is any hope that we'll see some better
solutions in the near future?

BTW, what did your comparisons tell you?

-- Brian

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners