Browse thread
[Caml-list] kprintf with user formatters
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2004-07-19 (10:45) |
From: | Jon Harrop <postmaster@j...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] kprintf with user formatters |
On Monday 19 July 2004 11:10, Pierre Weis wrote: > They also can have the wrong idea that arguments are not evaluated > (since there is no need to convert them to string) which is wrong. Forgive me if this is irrelevant (I've failed to understand all of your discussion) but can this be tied in with a general way to define functions with specified argument evaluation, e.g. to define your own, short-circuit- evaluated && operator: # (print_endline "1"; false) && (print_endline "2"; true);; 1 - : bool = false # let (&&) a b = a && b;; val ( && ) : bool -> bool -> bool = <fun> # (print_endline "1"; false) && (print_endline "2"; true);; 2 1 - : bool = false Not that I need such a thing... Cheers, Jon. ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners