Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] assertions or exceptions?
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Radu Grigore <radugrigore@g...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Unboxing options, was RE: assertions or exceptions?
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 13:20:00 -0400, John Prevost <> wrote:

> This has been discussed before.  The essential problem is this:
> Currently:
> type 'a option is not the same as type 'a option option [...]
> With unboxed options:
> type 'a option is the same as type 'a option option [...]

Heh.. This is an inconsistency in the current C# 2.0 spec :) (see
nullable types) By inconsistency I mean that it is not clear what is
the intended behaviour.


To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: