Browse thread
[Caml-list] kprintf with user formatters
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2004-07-28 (08:06) |
From: | skaller <skaller@u...> |
Subject: | Re: lazyness in ocaml (was : [Caml-list] kprintf with user formatters) |
On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 17:26, Pierre Weis wrote: > There is nothing such as your ``substitution principle'' in Caml, > except if we restrict the language to truly trivial expressions (as > soon as expressions may incoporate basic operators such as the integer > addition your ``principle'' does not stand anymore). I thought: let x = expr in f x and f expr are identical in all circumstances in Ocaml for all terms 'expr', I must have missed something .. do you have a counter example? -- John Skaller, mailto:skaller@users.sf.net voice: 061-2-9660-0850, snail: PO BOX 401 Glebe NSW 2037 Australia Checkout the Felix programming language http://felix.sf.net ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners