Browse thread
[Caml-list] const equivalent for mutable types?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Jon Harrop <jon@j...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Phantom types |
On Monday 23 August 2004 10:49, Jon Harrop wrote: > Secondly, specifying the types as Markus did (e.g. [> `Even])... I should add, using: val add_even_even : [> `Even ] t -> [> `Even ] t -> [> `Even ] t val add_even_odd : [> `Even ] t -> [> `Odd ] t -> [> `Odd ] t allows: # PhantomInt.add_even_odd i j;; val k : _[> `Odd ] PhantomInt.t = <abstr> which can then be misused: # PhantomInt.add_even_even i k;; - : [ `Even ] PhantomInt.t = <abstr> I think this is because [> `Even] means any superset of [ `Even ] whereas [< `Even], which was probably intended, means any subset of [ `Even ]. Indeed, the latter appears to work. Cheers, Jon. ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners