English version
Accueil     À propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    

Ce site est rarement mis à jour. Pour les informations les plus récentes, rendez-vous sur le nouveau site OCaml à l'adresse ocaml.org.

Browse thread
[Caml-list] strange effect of type annotation
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2004-08-11 (10:09)
From: fis@w...
Subject: [Caml-list] strange effect of type annotation

hi all,

I was just stumbling over something that is surely not a bug but a
slightly counterintuitive effect in the ocaml type system and thought
somebody might have an instructive comment.  (I know I should go read
the papers on ocaml typing, though. :-)

>   let good : (int * float) = let x                  = fst in (x (0,1), x (0., 1.));;
>   let bad  : (int * float) = let x: ('a * 'a) -> 'a = fst in (x (0,1), x (0., 1.));;

The type checker sais:

>   let bad  : (int * float) = let x: ('a * 'a) -> 'a = fst in (x (0,1), x (0., 1.));;
>                                                                          ^^^^^^^^
> This expression has type float * float but is here used with type int * int

I know that the type of fst is more general than this, but it looks
like it would have done the job for me here.  Why doesn't it?  And is
there a type annotation for x that does?


To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners