Browse thread
[Caml-list] Alternative Bytecodes for OCaml
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Keith Wansbrough <Keith.Wansbrough@c...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Re: bytecode and native code at once |
mikel wrote: > skaller wrote: > > On Thu, 2004-08-26 at 14:26, Brandon J. Van Every wrote: > >>I do wish bytecode and native code could be combined in the same > >>application. This is a typical game development scenario. > > This applies in many areas not just game development. > > I'd very much like to build an extensible compiler .. > > It's doable in principle. For example, the old MacScheme compiler used [..] > > I don't know what implications such a scheme might have for type safety > in Ocaml. GHCi, the interactive version of the Glasgow Haskell Compiler, supports both interpreted and compiled code in the same runtime. You might want to look at some of their design documents here: <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/documentation.html> In particular, the Run-time System document discusses the mixed-mode evaluation strategy. --KW 8-) ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners