Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] CFG's and OCaml
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Jon Harrop <jon@j...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] CFG's and OCaml

I have some (probably trivial) questions about parsers:

1. Are most programming languages designed to be implementable using lex and 

2. If so, are their designs restricted by this?

3. If so, is the fact that most languages disallow "a<b<c" due to this?

4. Could that be added to OCaml? ;-)

5. Is it productive to think in terms of coercing lex and yacc into doing as 
much of the work as possible and then using postprocessing to do the rest 
(e.g. this is the way I'd implement a<b<c)?


To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: