Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
[Caml-list] CFG's and OCaml
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: skaller <skaller@u...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] CFG's and OCaml
On Sun, 2004-08-15 at 06:57, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk wrote:
> W liście z sob, 14-08-2004, godz. 15:55 -0500, Brian Hurt napisał:
> 
> > The AST  of a<b<c has to be one of two ways:
> > 
> >        <                <
> >       / \              / \
> >     a    <      or    <   c
> >         / \          / \
> >        b   c        a   b
> 
> No, it can also be an error, which is IMHO a better choice.
> Unless it's made equivalent to a < b && b < c, like in Python.

Not in C++ where < can be overloaded. In that case,
 
	(a < b) < c

could be quite meaningful :)
 
-- 
John Skaller, mailto:skaller@users.sf.net
voice: 061-2-9660-0850, 
snail: PO BOX 401 Glebe NSW 2037 Australia
Checkout the Felix programming language http://felix.sf.net



-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners