On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Kenneth Knowles wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 06:52:35PM -0400, Shaddin Doghmi wrote:
> > this redundancy can be annoying, is there a way to declare Aout only
> > once and still be able to refer to it in b.ml ? How about including
> > a.mli in a.ml somehow? something along the lines of include in C would
> > do it, where including a.h in a.c would make it unnecessary to define
> > something in both...
>
> Someone may have a more elegant solution to this, but when I have a bunch of
> types that I don't want to have to repeat, I put them in a .ml file without a
> corresponding .mli file.

If it's just types (not exceptions) I find it a bit more suggestive to put them
in a .mli file. Not much difference.

-- Brian

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners